The Glass Menagerie
The Glass Menagerie
Dundee Rep
Neil Cooper
When actor Robbie Jack takes the microphone as Tennessee Williams' s alter-ego Tom Wingfield at the start of Jemima Levick's postmodern-tinged revival of Williams's 1944 semi-autobiographical full-length debut, he could be the compere of some latter-day live-art confessional cabaret night, channelling the spirit of Lenny Bruce and Eric Bogosian.
As Jack signals for the blank wall of Alex Lowde's clean-lined set to raise, it's an unexpected beginning to an openly sentimental affair that's more regularly gift-wrapped in traditional theatrical ribbons and bows.
Here, however, as type-written keywords from the script are projected above to signal moments within moments, the play becomes Tom's work in progress, which he writes ever larger with every reenactment he conjures up in dreams haunted by his mother Amanda and sister Laura.
The Wingfield apartment may be small, but it provides an escape route for all. For Irene Macdougall's Amanda, forever the disappointed débutante, it's a catwalk that allows her to claim the spotlight, her every reverie sounding like a dress rehearsal for an acceptance speech. For Millie Turner's Laura it's a safe-house where, like any other socially anxious young person, she can lose herself in records and the fantasy of her glass animal collection.
While for Tom it's both back- street prison and unexpected, if somewhat guilt-wracked inspiration, even Thomas Cotran's gentleman caller Jim seems to find himself anew there.
All dressed up with Joan Cleville's little choreographic flourishes and RJ McConnell's languid underscore for piano, clarinet and cello, Levick's impressionistic and mould-breaking re-imagining of Williams's poetic intentions is an exquisitely poignant construction that breathes fresh heartbreak into one of the saddest plays ever written.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article