'Fools rush in where angels fear to tread" the adage goes.
It's a phrase which comes agonisingly to mind as, in its desperately unravelling second half, one realises that Rob Drummond's Quiz Show, rather than being a pleasurable satire of the TV game show, has hurried to become an early (possibly the first) stage drama about the Jimmy Savile case.
If that seems like a spoiler, it's nothing compared with the cack-handed way in which Drummond (who deserves the laurels which came his way for past successes Mr Write and Bullet Catch) ruins his own play. In the first half of the piece – directed by Hamish Pirie on Andrew D Edwards's appropriately garish set – we are treated to a sometimes very funny parody of the television quiz show.
Jonathan Watson is in fine form as the oily host, Daniel Caplin. Indeed, there are fine performances all round as ambition spills over hilariously into vicious competition. However, in the midst of the satirical comedy, there are some oddities. Geeky contestant Ben (Paul Thomas Hickey), for instance, is an unlikely psychotherapist, while some of Caplin's questions are noticeably strange.
All is revealed in the play's disastrous second half, as the curiosities of the first are pieced together in the repressed mind of one-time game show contestant Sandra (Eileen Walsh). She builds a picture of child sexual abuse by a TV personality which (barring an outrageous coincidence) owes almost everything to the testimony of those who allege they were the victims of Savile.
Drummond – whose work has always exuded a principled humanism – is surely safe from accusations of exploiting a highly sensitive subject. However, he has failed to deal with the issue with anything like the necessary dramatic subtlety. There is a decided clumsiness in Sandra's self-revelation, compounded unforgivably by her long, utterly gratuitous closing monologue. There is nothing in the needlessly didactic and polemical concluding speech which one cannot discern from the character's initial revelations and the recent testimony of victims.
If the structure and the writing of Drummond's piece go badly awry, Adrian Mitchell's fine adaptation of Nikolai Gogol's play The Government Inspector continues to impress in Communicado's recast revival of their touring production from 2010. Three years on, director Gerry Mulgrew's company is co-producing the hit show with the Aberystwyth Arts Centre.
Arriving hot-footed from their Welsh tour, this pan-British ensemble delivers the superb satire of Czarist Russia in ways which are often quite different from the earlier production. The tremendously integrated live music and lovely moments of highly physical ensemble playing are still there, but the altered cast sends the piece in interesting new directions.
As the high heid yins of the remote town panic at the news that a government inspector will arrive soon with a view to sniffing out graft and malpractice, Oliver Lavery is a revelation in the role of Khlestakhov, a layabout petty bureaucrat from St Petersburg whom the townsfolk mistake for the titular assessor. Looking a little like Eddie Izzard and performing – as the situation goes to his character's easily inflated head – increasingly like Rik Mayall in full Lord Flashheart mode, Lavery gives a virtuousic comic performance (and one which reminds us that Mayall did, indeed, play the lead in the premiere of this adaptation back in 1985).
Elsewhere, Stephen Marzella gives a fine performance as the corrupt governor. However, invidious though such comparisons are, it is difficult not to long for the hilarious, eye-popping outrage of John Bett's governor in 2010.
Personnel changes aside, the piece is recognisably the work of Mulgrew, who is, simultaneously, the most Scottish and most European of directors. The production has the same brilliant pace and timing as before and, even if it feels a little small for a large auditorium such as the King's, it remains a rollicking good night out.
To talk of a good night out, in theatre terms, is almost inevitable to alight on the name of John Godber. The author of such box-office hits as Bouncers and Teechers, Godber remains one of the most widely produced English playwrights. However, watching this Perth Theatre/Tron co-production of his 1992 romantic comedy April In Paris reminds one that it makes no more sense to acclaim a play on the basis of its popularity than it does to denounce it for the same reason.
Directed and neatly designed by Kenny Miller, and played nicely by Emma Gregory and Andrew Westfield, this two-hander about Bet and Al (a working-class couple from Yorkshire who, struggling in the wake of Al's redundancy, win a short trip to Paris) has all of the big-heartedness that has come to characterise Godber's drama. However, despite the fluency and occasional poetics of the writing, it also has all the dodgy sitcom obviousness of his oeuvre (for example, Al proclaims that the bathroom in the Paris hotel has "two toilets", one of which, inevitably, is a bidet).
Everything in April In Paris – from its sentimental, sometimes bleak comedy to its working-class political sympathies – exists on the surface. A master of his populist genre, Godber leaves us searching in vain for any dramatic depth.
For tour dates for The Government Inspector, visit www.communicadotheatre.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article