When boys and girls come out to play, there is a risk they'll end up fighting.
Which may have something to do with why the two winners of this year's Platform 18 theatre-making award at The Arches in Glasgow have kept to their own gender.
Peter McMaster offers an all-male adaptation of Emily Bronte's windswept romance Wuthering Heights, and Amanda Monfrooe looks to classical Greek forms for POKE, in which the last two women in the world explore male violence against women. Exercises in seemingly separatist sexual politics sound like the sort of thing that come out of a 1970s, the-personal-is-political line of inquiry, yet the younger generation of theatre-makers that McMaster and Monfrooe represent tackle their subjects with refreshing contemporary seriousness.
"We're finding ways to understand modes of expression of men," says McMaster. "I've fixated on the character of Heathcliff. He's an orphan, and as a reader you don't know why he's so aggressive. Then there's this weird mysterious part of the book when he disappears, and comes back with all this money. By asking questions about that, we might be able to fill the gaps, but we're also finding out what are the important questions we should be asking about ourselves as men."
Wuthering Heights' other main character is, of course, Cathy, which has involved McMaster and co putting on dresses and exploring how that makes them feel. Having men playing women in serious drama dates back to Shakespeare's day, when boy players would take on the lead female roles. This tradition was rebooted by Edward Hall's all-male Shakespeare company, Propeller. One thinks too of comedian Eddie Izzard and artist Grayson Perry, both of whom enjoy wearing women's clothes without recourse to dragging it up.
"It's perhaps different for us than it was with Shakespeare," McMaster observes, "because then you had a man playing a woman, and everyone knew it was a man, so it was the actor's job to convince you otherwise.
"What we're doing isn't drag, and we're not trying to be women, so we don't know what it is. We're inhabiting a grey area of what's already a grey area, and we're enjoying the sensation of wearing a dress just for how it makes us feel. It's fun to put a dress on, and it's fun to enjoy the melodrama of the story, and get to be emotional in a way men might not normally be, but we're not trying to address the problems of feminism here, but the problems of masculinism, which is a word you won't find in the dictionary."
Wuthering Heights is the public side of a process in which McMaster and his company have been going on retreats and spending other time together beyond the rehearsal room in a way that sounds like a men's group. Given that McMaster is part of several men's groups, this is an observation he's happy to accept.
"It's about seeing what happens when, as a group of men, you go to vulnerable places," he says, "and to find space for reflection on things that might be important. There are no easy answers, but I like going to raw places, and if people don't want to go there, I like to try and get them to go there with me."
McMaster's previous work at The Arches and the Forest Fringe in Edinburgh includes House, in which the audience smashed up discarded furniture and made something new from it, several solo works, and The Fire Burns and Burns, a collaboration with Nic Green. Monfrooe's back catalogue includes How Keanu Reeves Saved The World, some cabaret-style pieces at her devised performance event, Love Club, and a placement with the National Theatre of Scotland.
With POKE, Monfrooe goes beyond the likes of McMaster's meditations to expose how the whole notion of something that might be called the sex wars goes way beyond metaphor. She wasn't short of material.
"It writes itself," she says. "Every time I look at the news, there's a barrage of stories regarding the violation of women's freedom in every country, and it's getting worse. Things are out of control, and there's no rhyme or reason for that. There's a sexual apocalypse, whereby anybody's game. A little girl was raped, but her best friend says, well, you shouldn't have worn that. If the female body is game, then it's the male body next. Then it's bestiality and paedophilia.
"There's this feeling that we're on a slippery slope. Peter feels the need to ask questions of himself as a man, whereas, as a woman, I'm angry. We need to take a frank look at sex, our bodies, and what our bodies have been reduced to."
While this may sound extreme, it is in keeping with the aesthetic which Monfrooe has developed.
"All of my work has been about asking big questions," she says, "but this isn't an issue-based play, and it isn't polemic, because we don't solve the problem of sexual violence, and that's because it can't be solved.
"There's something fundamental that says men and women can't live together in harmony, and that's to do with the little dangly bit between a man's legs."
Monfrooe laughs when she says this but, while there is levity in the play, she's deadly serious.
"The phallus was prized in Greek culture," she says. "and women were slaves, although they were valued for their beauty and intelligence. What I'm interested in is playing with form, and the Greek structure of inevitability, where everything always comes to a violent end. POKE starts like that, but then goes somewhere else. I wanted to talk about something that's really difficult, then take a sideways glance at it. Our role is to ask, not to answer, and to leave the ellipses for the audience to answer. I can't occupy an ideological position with any commitment, but someone like Peter is asking a very different set of questions, and that's brave."
Wuthering Heights and POKE, The Arches, Glasgow, April 23-27; Traverse Theatre, Edinburgh, May 1-3. Visit www.thearches.co.uk and www.traverse.co.uk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article