Glasgow Comedy Festival
Simon Amstell: To Be Free, Citizens Theatre
Marianne Gunn
Four stars
As one of the more youthful -looking 35-year-old comedians on the circuit, Simon Amstell must be doing something right. He preaches being vegan with a ferocious tenacity and, although he does not mention this is in the show, he is also teetotal. Calling his show 'To Be Free' seems somewhat ironic, as Amstell has placed so many restrictions on himself; it seems when an opportunity to enjoy himself arises he has the ability to thwart his own pleasure at every turn - possibly, by his own admission, turning down some beautiful adventures on the way.
Amstell's Jewish background has featured heavily in his previous work, whether his stand-up or his writing. His parent's divorce is also, evidently, something which has shaped his experiences and, although he claims to have found romantic happiness now, he still does not appear completely content. Such is the life of a clown (unless, as Amstell quite rightly points out, you're his friend Russell Brand).
His show's content is both cerebral and puerile, which is quite a balancing act; he refers to himself as a juggler occasionally and his interaction with the audience shows the nimble workings of his mind. Sometimes an element of disdain can enter his wordplay though and - unless it is all part of the well-formed stage persona - that might explain why he does not have mass appeal. "How can homosexuality still be judged when Elton John wrote The Lion King?" was one of his more whimsical observations.
Support was provided by Norwegian Daniel Simonsen who, through dead pan observations and gentle physical comedy, gave an insight into his world of self-deprecation and cats - he's one to watch.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article