As known for their mind-bending live performances as much as their polarising musical tendencies and goofball humour, the three-hour display by Rush (below) at the SECC was perhaps their most ambitious outing to date.
Fireworks, video skits, strings, live projections, cosmic set pieces and a revolving drum kit all featured in a show already dense in its own musical weight. This kind of sensory excess has become expected of a band that not only pioneered the conceptual grandiosity of prog rock, but boldly traversed almost all corners of the modern musical spectrum – from reggae to metal to new wave – with little to no irony or shame.
Last night, the newly inducted Rock and Roll Hall of Famers loudly and proudly spent the first hour or so guiding us through rare gems from their shaky retro-futuristic middle period with surprisingly rewarding results, beginning with a glorious double-dose of Subdivisions and Big Money.
Slinking effortlessly into tracks like Grand Designs and Limelight, they continued to showcase their most polished and angular side before returning after a short break with a mammoth run though last year's Clockwork Angels. Admittedly a difficult album to break down on casual listens given its enormity and weight, the virtuosity and strength of musical vision the band still possess so late in the game is astounding and was made abundantly clear throughout the album's bulky offering. But before any lifers could get up in arms, a 40-minute gauntlet of solid-gold classics from the Rush vault – Dreamline, The Spirit Of Radio and Tom Sawyer – was rounded out by a rare trip though the immortal 2112 overture and accompanying Temples Of Syrinx, bringing yet another untouchable performance to a thrilling close.
Music
✶ ✶ ✶ ✶
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article