MAKE no mistake about this.
James MacMillan's Third Piano Concerto, subtitled The Mysteries of Light, which received its UK premiere performances on Friday and Saturday at the Usher Hall and the Glasgow Royal Concert Hall, is a dazzling, immediately accessible and instantly recognisable masterpiece.
I've heard most, though not all, of the music in MacMillan's vast output in the last 24 years. No single piece, in my experience, so comprehensively demonstrates the composer's mastery of his technique and stylistic idiom.
At the first performance on Friday, I thought: I absolutely get this. I recognised the snippet of plainchant that forms the main theme of the work. On Saturday, in a public chat before the show, I asked him to sing it (twice). He obliged, and, hopefully, those present got the link, and the hook.
It is a stunning piece, glittering and gleaming, chock-full of thematic integration, glorious filigree piano writing, imposingly-bronzed brass chorales, wildly-infectious dance rhythms, and all of it unified by that tiny plainchant refrain, reiterated ad infinitum until it is not just the idée fixe of the concerto, it is its heartbeat.
As I said to anyone who would listen at the weekend, it's a great piece which should be snapped up globally. I was absolutely blown away by the performance of Superman pianist Jean-Yves Thibaudet, conductor Peter Oundjian and an RSNO that gave it nothing less than a full-blown, full-on treatment from first bar to last.
Beside it, Oundjian's treatment of Britten's Simple Symphony seemed a bit laboured and heavy-footed, though his full-screen vision of Holst's huge Planets Suite was panoramic in its breadth of intepretation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article