Lisa-Marie Ferla verdict: four stars
Those who would judge hip hop as having less cultural cachet than other art forms have clearly never seen Nicki Minaj in concert.
Touring in support of 2014's The Pinkprint, the Trinidadian-New Yorker eschewed the party hits - at least until the end of the night - in favour of some of the more emotive cuts from her latest album. The first section of the four-part show in particular, which opened with the autobiographical and deeply moving "All Things Go", was closer to a carefully-plotted opera than a pop showcase: and, much like opera, it didn't really matter when you couldn't make out the words over the thudding bass because the story was obvious.
Words, of course, are Minaj's currency, and she had no intention of being tight with them. "Feeling Myself", the album's collaboration with Beyonc�, was a raunchy demonstration of the MC's vocal acrobatics, while "Lookin' Ass" and revenge anthem "Did It On 'Em" found her spitting words like ammo in a pair of sparkly knee-high boots and a shrapnel-covered bra. The dancers may similarly have only been in underwear, but together they looked like the most fearless girl gang of all time.
Later on, Minaj slowed things down in a hot pink halterneck dress, accompanied by a piano and two gospel singers. Heartbreak ballad "Pills n Potions" featured a breathtaking vocal performance, while Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded's "Marilyn Monroe" gave me chills.
But there was still time for pink tutus and party hits, fashioning a makeshift kilt from a tartan blanket passed up from the audience and changing the words to "Super Bass" to reflect how Minaj "really got a thing for Scottish boys". By that time, the feeling was mutual.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article