There were remarkable scenes at the end of this abruptly-terminated concert, Eric Clapton's first in Glasgow in three years.
It had gone exceptionally well from the audience's point of view, with Clapton and his band, which included Andy Fairweather-Low and Paul Carrack, running through some blues standards and a handful of Clapton's own hits, such as Layla and Tears in Heaven.
Near the end though, as the band launched into JJ Cale's Cocaine, they had only got a minute or two into it before Clapton unslung his guitar and made his way off the stage. The rest of the band, seemingly taken by surprise, followed suit.
After two minutes, the musicians returned, Clapton saying briefly: "Sorry about that."
The band abandoned Cocaine and played what turned out to be the final number, High Time We Went, with Carrack taking vocals.
The song over, Clapton picked up his jacket and walked off stage without so much as a 'goodnight'.
As the house lights went up, there was a chorus of booing from the audience, who had paid around £60 each for their tickets.
It is not known what caused Clapton's strop though it may have had something to do with the sound. Some fans reported hearing an echo at the rear of the hall for parts of the show.
One confrontation near the mixing desk saw one male fan in a Clapton tour T shirt argue with a steward who asked him to quieten down.
Several fans at the venue spoke loudly of demanding a refund. Stewards had to deal with a large number of upset customers but were powerless to placate them.
It was a sobering and entirely unexpected end to what had earlier been a fine concert.
Its highlights had included Layla and Tears in Heaven, a great version of Crossroads, and Paul Carrack's soulful 70s chart hit with Ace, How Long?, complete with some brilliant Clapton soloing.
The energetic Scottish support act, Hunter and the Bear, had earlier described Clapton as "one hell of a headliner", and so it turned out.
It's just a shame that Clapton's dissatisfaction with a so-far unidentified problem should have taken the shine off it so decisively, and left many of his fans angry and disappointed.
One fan who was at the gig, Matthew Waddell, 18, posted on social media: "Absolutely disgraced at Eric Clapton for leaving the stage halfway through the set without word of warning or anything and for the Hydro for not saying WTF was happening!"
Another angry fan at the concert said: "I've been going to see this guy for 15 years and I've never seen anything like this.It's f***ing ridiculous that he should walk off the stage like that. It was real toys-out-of-the pram stuff."
A female fan in her 30s, who spoke with a Dutch accent, said she and her companion did not understand why a major star like Clapton should have terminated a concert so abruptly.
By 11.30pm, the Hydro's Facebook page was alive with comments from highly irate customers, who all said they felt short-changed.
One, Wojtek Sromek, said bitterly: "For a guy who travelled across half Europe to see Clapton at the SSE I feel truly unsatisfied.
"I believe some explanation is necessary if you want people to treat you seriously."
June Ramsay said: "I never post on FB but I cannot say how disappointed I am - no explanation which (for us was) definitely required.
"I live in Glasgow so only had to lay for tickets - which were dear enough - but totally feel for people who had travelled from all over to see him."
Someone called Glasgow John hit out: "A disgrace Clapton acting like a spoilt wean throwing the dummy oot the pram. Everyone should demand a refund."
Carrel Hendrie told the Hydro: "Think we are due an explanation as to what happened tonight. As it is there was no announcement made in the arena to apologise. No apologies on Facebook, Twitter or your website...poor customer relations. Are we due a partial refund?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article