Music
SCO, City Halls, Glasgow
Keith Bruce
Five stars
I very much welcome the Scottish Chamber Orchestra's relatively recent practice of listing the musicians at the front of their concert programmes rather than further back. For this concert that should have been true of the 60 or so members of the SCO Chorus as well. A Mozart Requiem was always likely to produce a full house, and this concert, conducted by the great founder of Collegium Vocal Gent, Philippe Herreweghe, rewarded the capacity audience in full.
His Requiem, in the original Sussmayr completion, balanced the forces onstage - a superb quartet of soloists from Germany, Hungary, and Croatia also clearly under his direction, between band and choir - from the opening bars of the Introitus when the choir's entrance left plenty power in reserve. That was as true in the contribution of individual instrumental soloists like principle clarinet Maximiliano Martin and in the operatic ensemble contributions from the soloists on the Tuba mirum and Benedictus, and in the delicacy of the orchestral accompaniment to the Lacrimosa. But it was the performance of Gregory Batsleer's chorus that was the best thing in a Requiem that was profound and moving.
In a sense we had heard the encore at the start of the concert, in a clever programme that began with Mozart's Kyie in D Minor from a decade earlier, a fragment that is something of a rarity but a lovely stand-alone showcase for a choir in its elegant simplicity.
Between the two were the two movements of Schubert's "Unfinished" Eighth Symphony. The idea that the composer simply became bored of a work already packed with incident and full of melodies seems fantastical. Here is was the SCO strings that really sparkled in a reading where Herreweghe made the orchestra sing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article