They will not be singing Tod Machover's Festival City, an EIF commission for which the MIT professor solicited aural contributions via the internet, on the terraces, but its evocation of Edinburgh should assure it some place as an anthem.
The Festival itself was invoked in snatches of melody from the classical repertoire, and they sat comfortably alongside the cries of gulls and the skirl of the pipes in a work that may also have attempted to suggest the architecture but was more obviously about the people in its snatches of voices. Its climax was perhaps a little grander than the capital often feels, but it has aye had pretentions that way.
The music was far from pretentious, however, and sat comfortably between the Cocteau-inspired demanding fast repeated string phrases of The Infernal Machine by Chistopher Rouse and the grand cinematic sweep of John Adams's City Noir, where sax soloist Simon Haram, the RSNO's own principal trombone Davur Juul Magnussen and and guest lead trumpet Huw Morgan were given jazz big band roles, in an all-American second half.
This was a night of big sound pictures, opening with a stirring Verdi overture, La forza del destino, followed by the Bruch Violin Concerto with Pinchas Zukerman. A work that has become a popular showpiece for the young virtuoso, here it was played in an altogether more measure and ultimately rewarding way, the communication between soloist and conductor Peter Oundjian palpable, and Zukerman clearly relishing the gloriously supportive string sound of the orchestra.
Was the RSNO previously capable of performing such a concert with such assurance and swagger? It certainly is now.
Sponsored by ARUP
A version of this review appeared in later editions of yesterday's Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article